Watch the Training
Training Video Coming Soon The video will demonstrate how to revise Exploring Dayton’s Aviation Heritage using moderator reflections, summarized participant feedback, and a structured AI review.
Have an existing outline, syllabus, or session plan available so you can follow the process with one of your own seminars.
Overview
Updating a seminar is different from designing one from the beginning. You already have valuable content, tested explanations, participant questions, useful examples, and teaching choices worth preserving. The goal is not to ask AI to replace the seminar. The goal is to use AI to help you examine it more systematically.
A productive revision begins with evidence: your own notes, the actual session plan, general themes from participant evaluations, changes in available time, and information that may need to be updated. AI can then help identify patterns, compare options, and propose targeted improvements. You remain responsible for deciding which changes will strengthen the seminar.
What You Will Learn
- How to identify a clear reason for revising a seminar.
- How to gather useful evidence without sharing private participant information.
- How to create a concise revision brief for an AI tool.
- How to ask AI to diagnose the seminar before rewriting it.
- How to prioritize changes to scope, pacing, sequence, engagement, or materials.
- How to compare the original and revised plans while preserving your strongest content.
- How to save a moderator-approved seminar revision plan.
Continuing Example: Exploring Dayton’s Aviation Heritage
The First Version Has Been Taught
In Module 1, the moderator created a four-session seminar blueprint. The seminar has now been taught once. Participants were engaged, but the moderator noticed that some sessions were overloaded and that the strongest conversations did not always receive enough time.
The moderator wants to improve the next offering without losing the historical images, local stories, and interpretive themes that participants valued.
Session 1: Ran long and included too much background.
Session 2: Strong discussion, but repeated some content.
Session 3: Tried to cover industry, research, employment, and regional identity.
Session 4: Public memory discussion felt rushed.
Before You Begin: Summarize Feedback Without Identifying Participants
Do not paste evaluation forms containing names, email addresses, contact information, or identifiable personal comments into an AI tool. Remove identifiers and summarize feedback as general themes—for example, “several participants wanted more time for image analysis” or “the final discussion felt rushed.”
Step-by-Step Guide
Begin by understanding the problem. Do not ask AI to rewrite the seminar until you have identified what you want to preserve, what evidence suggests needs attention, and which changes matter most.
Identify Why the Seminar Needs Revision
A general feeling that a seminar “could be better” is not specific enough. Name the problem you are trying to solve.
- Review your notes immediately after each session, if available.
- Identify where you ran short on time or had unused time.
- Note which explanations, examples, activities, or discussions worked especially well.
- Summarize common participant questions or evaluation themes.
- Identify information, links, examples, or resources that may now be outdated.
- Determine whether the seminar length, format, or audience has changed.
Possible Reasons for Revising a Seminar
- The seminar contains too much material for the available sessions.
- Some sessions repeat information or lack a clear focus.
- The sequence does not build logically.
- Participants need more background before discussing complex ideas.
- There is too little time for questions and interaction.
- Examples, data, links, or references need to be updated.
- The seminar will be offered in a different number of weeks.
Gather Evidence Before Asking AI
AI can only analyze the information you provide. Gather the materials that show what the seminar currently does and where revision may be needed.
Useful Materials
- Current seminar description
- Learning goals
- Session-by-session outline
- Syllabus or weekly plan
- Moderator reflection notes
- General evaluation themes
- Frequently asked participant questions
Information to Remove or Generalize
- Participant names
- Email addresses or phone numbers
- Roster information
- Identifiable evaluation comments
- Private health or personal information
- Confidential University information
- Restricted or unlicensed source material
Important: Provide only the amount of material needed for the revision task. A short, organized summary is often more useful than uploading every document connected to the seminar.
Create a Revision Brief
A revision brief tells AI what the seminar currently includes, what worked, what did not work, and what must remain unchanged.
Sample Prompt: Establish the Revision Context
I am revising a four-session UDOLLI seminar called Exploring Dayton’s Aviation Heritage. The audience is adult lifelong learners, and each session is two hours. The seminar uses historical images, short presentations, local stories, and discussion. I will provide the current outline, moderator reflections, and summarized participant feedback. Help me identify possible revision priorities, but do not rewrite the seminar yet. Preserve the seminar’s focus on experimentation, innovation, regional identity, and public memory. Do not invent facts, quotations, sources, or participant feedback.
Example Revision Evidence
What worked: Historical images, local stories, and the discussion about experimentation generated strong engagement.
What needs attention: Session 1 contained too much background; Sessions 1 and 2 repeated some material; Session 3 attempted to cover too many themes; Session 4 did not leave enough time for interpretation and discussion.
What must remain: Four sessions, a clear local focus, time for participant discussion, and the connection between aviation history and Dayton’s identity.
Ask AI to Diagnose Before Rewriting
A diagnosis helps separate the real instructional problems from surface-level wording changes. Ask AI to explain what it sees and connect each recommendation to the evidence.
Sample Prompt: Diagnose the Existing Seminar
Review the current outline and revision evidence. Identify the seminar’s three strongest features and no more than five revision priorities. For each priority, explain the evidence, the likely effect on participant learning or engagement, and the type of change that may help. Consider scope, pacing, sequence, repetition, background knowledge, engagement, and closure. Do not rewrite the sessions yet.
Review the diagnosis critically. AI may identify a pattern that is useful, but it may also misunderstand why a topic is essential. Correct the analysis before moving to the revision stage.
Select and Prioritize the Changes
You do not need to act on every suggestion. Select a manageable number of changes with the strongest evidence and greatest likely benefit.
| Evidence |
What It Suggests |
Possible Response |
| Session 1 ran long. |
The opening session includes more background than participants need. |
Reduce general history and move one essential concept into Session 2. |
| Sessions 1 and 2 repeated content. |
The purpose of each session is not distinct enough. |
Make Session 1 about context and Session 2 about experimentation and problem-solving. |
| Session 3 covered four major themes. |
The scope prevents depth and discussion. |
Center the session on research and regional identity; treat other topics as supporting examples. |
| Session 4 discussion was rushed. |
Too much presentation precedes the final synthesis. |
Shorten the content portion and reserve a protected discussion block. |
A useful rule: preserve strengths first, address the most consequential problem next, and avoid changing more than you can realistically prepare and test.
Request Targeted Revisions
Once you select the priorities, tell AI exactly what to revise and what to leave alone.
Sample Prompt: Revise the Session Structure
Revise the four-session outline using these decisions: preserve the use of historical images and local stories; reduce general background in Session 1; remove repetition between Sessions 1 and 2; make Session 2 specifically about experimentation and problem-solving; narrow Session 3 to aviation research and regional identity; and reserve at least 35 minutes in Session 4 for interpretation, synthesis, and discussion. Show the revised outline beside a concise explanation of what changed and why.
Possible Revised Structure
Session 1: Dayton and the Conditions for Innovation
Establish the local context and introduce the central questions without attempting a complete history of the region.
Session 2: Experimentation, Failure, and Problem-Solving
Focus on iterative testing, evidence, persistence, and the process of turning an idea into a workable solution.
Session 3: Aviation Research and Dayton’s Regional Identity
Examine how research, institutions, employment, and civic identity became connected to aviation.
Session 4: Remembering and Interpreting Aviation Heritage
Use selected examples to examine how historic places, museums, archives, and public stories influence collective memory.
Compare the Original and Revised Versions
Do not evaluate the revised plan in isolation. Compare it directly with the original so you can see what was retained, removed, reorganized, or added.
Sample Prompt: Create a Before-and-After Comparison
Create a comparison table with these columns: original element, proposed revision, reason for the change, potential benefit, and possible risk or tradeoff. Include only changes supported by the revision evidence. Flag any change that could remove an essential topic or require substantial new preparation.
- Confirm that the revised seminar still reflects its original purpose.
- Check that your strongest examples and activities were not removed.
- Look for important content that was oversimplified or misplaced.
- Estimate how much new preparation each change will require.
- Reject revisions that do not provide a clear instructional benefit.
Update the Connected Seminar Components
A structural revision may require changes to the description, learning goals, weekly plan, presentation, discussion activities, and handouts.
Sample Prompt: Identify Connected Updates
Based on the approved revised outline, identify which connected seminar materials may need updating. Review the seminar description, learning goals, session titles, presentation sequence, discussion opportunities, and participant handouts. For each item, explain whether it needs no change, a minor change, or a substantial revision. Do not draft the new materials yet.
This step prevents inconsistencies—for example, a seminar description that promises topics no longer covered or learning goals that are no longer supported by the revised sessions.
Verify Current Information and Sources
An updated seminar may require current dates, organizational information, links, examples, or research. AI can help identify what needs checking, but it should not be treated as the source of truth.
- Mark every fact, date, quotation, statistic, link, and citation that may have changed.
- Return to the original source rather than relying on AI’s summary.
- Prefer authoritative museums, archives, libraries, government sources, scholarly works, and original documents when appropriate.
- Replace broken links and outdated screenshots.
- Document the source and date of verification in your working notes.
Module 5, Review AI Output for Accuracy and Tone, will provide a complete quality-review process.
Save a Moderator-Approved Revision Plan
Save your decisions outside the AI conversation so you have a clear record of what will change and what will remain.
- List the seminar’s strengths to preserve.
- Record the evidence that led to each revision priority.
- Save the approved session sequence.
- Identify materials that require minor or substantial updates.
- Assign factual claims and sources for verification.
- Note preparation tasks, deadlines, and any help you may need.
Your Product from Module 2
You should now have a Seminar Revision Plan: documented strengths, evidence-based priorities, an approved revised structure, a list of connected materials to update, and a verification checklist.
Try It: Diagnose One Existing Seminar
A 10-Minute Practice Activity
Select one seminar you have taught or planned. Focus on one meaningful improvement rather than attempting a complete redesign.
Preserve
Write down two elements that worked well and should remain unchanged.
Evidence
Record two or three non-identifying observations that suggest a revision is needed.
Diagnose
Use the diagnosis prompt and ask AI for no more than three revision priorities.
Decide
Select one change to make. Record the expected benefit, preparation required, and any facts or sources that must be checked.
Review Checkpoint Before Moving On
Before revising your seminar materials, confirm that:
- The revision is supported by moderator experience, participant needs, or another clear source of evidence.
- The strongest parts of the existing seminar are intentionally preserved.
- The revised scope is realistic for the number and length of sessions.
- The seminar description, learning goals, and session plan still align.
- Participant feedback was summarized without names or identifying details.
- Current information, links, quotations, and sources will be independently verified.
- The final decisions reflect your expertise rather than the AI tool’s preferences.
Best Practices
Diagnose First
Ask what is causing the problem before asking AI to rewrite the seminar.
Preserve Strengths
Explicitly name the content, examples, activities, and approaches that should remain.
Use Evidence
Connect revision decisions to timing notes, recurring questions, participant needs, or changes in the seminar context.
Prioritize
Choose a few high-value revisions rather than changing every part of the seminar at once.
Compare Versions
Review the old and new plans side by side so important content is not lost accidentally.
Document Decisions
Save the reason for each change so you can evaluate its effect after the seminar is taught again.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Asking AI to replace the whole seminar: A complete rewrite may discard effective content and create unnecessary preparation.
- Sharing raw evaluation responses: Summarize themes and remove all identifying information.
- Treating every suggestion as a requirement: AI recommendations are options, not decisions.
- Changing content without changing the goals: The description, learning goals, sessions, and materials must remain aligned.
- Focusing only on wording: The more important problems may involve scope, sequence, pacing, or engagement.
- Adding current information without verification: Newer does not automatically mean accurate or appropriate.
Resources and Related Guidance
- Use AI to Design a New Seminar
Return to Module 1 if you need to rebuild the seminar’s foundation or create a new blueprint.
- Creating Quality Learning Objectives
Check whether revised learning goals remain clear, observable, and realistic.
- Recommended Seminar Materials
Review the core documents that may need updating after the seminar structure changes.
- Use Images, Charts and Media Effectively
Strengthen visual and media resources as part of the seminar revision.
- AI Seminar Revision Worksheet
A planned worksheet for documenting strengths, evidence, priorities, revisions, and verification tasks.
Download in development
- AI Seminar Development Workbook
A planned workbook connecting the practice activities from all five AI modules.
Download in development
Common Questions
What if I do not have participant evaluation data?
You can still use your session notes, timing observations, recurring participant questions, attendance patterns, and your own reflection. Be clear about which conclusions are based on your experience rather than participant feedback.
Can I paste an entire syllabus into an AI tool?
Use only an approved tool and confirm that the material is appropriate to share. Remove private information and avoid including restricted or copyrighted content that you do not have permission to provide. A concise outline may be sufficient for many revision tasks.
How much of the seminar should I change at once?
Prioritize the changes most likely to improve learning, pacing, or engagement. A few deliberate revisions are easier to prepare and evaluate than a complete overhaul.
What if AI recommends removing a topic I consider essential?
Keep it. Explain why the topic is essential and ask for another way to manage the scope, such as reducing background, moving optional content to a handout, or changing the activity format.
How do I know whether the revision worked?
Before teaching the updated seminar, record what you changed and what improvement you expect. Afterward, compare the actual timing, participant engagement, recurring questions, and evaluation themes with your expectations.
Previous: Design a New Seminar
Return to the seminar blueprint and planning process from Module 1.
Return to Module 1
Next: Create Discussion Questions
Use the revised session goals to develop purposeful, open-ended questions.
Continue to Module 3
University of Dayton Olli