Watch the Training
Training Video Coming Soon The video will demonstrate how to build and refine a discussion sequence for Exploring Dayton’s Aviation Heritage.
Have one seminar session, learning goal, reading, image, case, or presentation topic available so you can follow along.
Overview
Strong discussion questions do more than fill time after a presentation. They help participants make sense of information, compare perspectives, connect ideas, test interpretations, and contribute their own observations. AI can quickly generate many possible questions, but quantity is not the same as quality.
The moderator must decide what the discussion is meant to accomplish, select questions that fit the audience and available time, revise loaded or unclear wording, and prepare follow-up prompts that keep the conversation moving. The goal is a purposeful discussion plan—not a long list of disconnected questions.
What You Will Learn
- How to begin with a clear session goal and discussion purpose.
- How to provide AI with enough context to generate useful questions.
- How to create questions at different levels of depth.
- How to identify leading, loaded, overly broad, or unnecessarily personal questions.
- How to revise questions for clarity, neutrality, accessibility, and respectful participation.
- How to create follow-up prompts and a realistic discussion sequence.
- How to save a moderator-approved Discussion Facilitation Plan.
Continuing Example: Exploring Dayton’s Aviation Heritage
Session 4 Needs a Stronger Discussion Plan
In Module 2, the moderator revised the final session so that at least 35 minutes would be reserved for interpretation, synthesis, and discussion. The session focuses on how museums, historic places, archives, and public stories shape the way communities remember aviation history.
The moderator now needs a small set of well-sequenced questions that help participants enter the conversation, examine evidence, compare interpretations, and reflect on the responsibilities involved in preserving public history.
Session: Remembering and Interpreting Aviation Heritage
Time available: 35 minutes
Materials: Two historical images and two museum-description excerpts
Goal: Compare how public-history choices influence meaning and memory
Before You Begin: Plan for Respectful Participation
Do not ask participants to disclose private experiences, personal beliefs, health information, finances, trauma, or other sensitive information unless that disclosure is clearly optional and appropriate to the seminar. Review AI-generated questions for stereotypes, assumptions, political framing, false choices, or language that pressures participants toward one preferred answer.
Build a Discussion Ladder
A productive discussion usually moves from accessible entry points toward deeper interpretation and closes with synthesis. You may not use every type in every session, but this sequence provides a useful planning framework.
Opening
Invites initial observation, curiosity, or prior knowledge.
Clarifying
Checks understanding of a concept, source, image, or claim.
Interpretive
Asks participants to analyze, compare, explain, or support a conclusion.
Application
Connects the idea to another context, example, experience, or current question.
Closing
Encourages synthesis, reflection, or an unresolved question to carry forward.
Step-by-Step Guide
Start with the purpose of the discussion. Then generate more questions than you need, evaluate them carefully, and build a short sequence that fits the available time.
Define the Purpose of the Discussion
Before asking AI for questions, decide what participants should do with the content. A question designed to check understanding is different from one designed to compare interpretations or examine implications.
- Identify the session learning goal.
- Name the source, image, idea, case, or experience participants will discuss.
- Decide what kind of thinking the discussion should support.
- Note how much time is available.
- Identify any sensitive issues or language that require care.
- Decide whether participants will discuss as a full group, in pairs, or in small groups.
Example Discussion Purpose
Participants will compare two ways of presenting Dayton aviation history and discuss how decisions about images, labels, objects, and omitted details influence the story a museum or historic site tells.
Give AI the Necessary Context
Include the topic, audience, learning goal, source material, time, and desired tone. Tell AI not to invent facts or assume participants share the same background or viewpoint.
Sample Prompt: Establish the Discussion Context
I am planning a 35-minute discussion for adult lifelong learners in a seminar called Exploring Dayton’s Aviation Heritage. The session focuses on how museums, historic places, archives, and public stories shape collective memory. Participants will compare two historical images and two short museum-description excerpts. The learning goal is to compare how choices about evidence, emphasis, and omission influence interpretation. Help me create discussion questions that are open-ended, clear, respectful, and accessible to participants with varied prior knowledge. Do not invent factual details or assume that participants share one political, cultural, or personal viewpoint.
Generate a Range of Question Types
Ask for more options than you plan to use. Organizing questions by purpose makes it easier to choose a balanced sequence.
Sample Prompt: Generate Options
Create 15 possible questions organized into five categories: opening, clarifying, interpretive, application, and closing. Include three questions in each category. Avoid yes-or-no questions, trivia questions, leading language, and questions that require participants to disclose private information. Keep each question concise enough to read aloud.
Opening
Invite close observation before asking for interpretation.
What is the first detail you notice in these two images, and what draws your attention to it?
Clarifying
Help participants establish a shared understanding of the source.
What does each description emphasize as important, and what information does it provide to support that emphasis?
Interpretive
Invite comparison, explanation, and evidence-based reasoning.
How does each presentation shape our understanding of who contributed to Dayton’s aviation story?
Application
Connect the analysis to a broader public-history decision.
What choices would you make if you were designing a small exhibit for visitors who knew little about Dayton aviation?
Closing
Encourage synthesis or continued reflection.
What responsibility do public-history organizations have when deciding which stories to preserve, emphasize, or revisit?
Evaluate Every Question
AI can produce polished wording that still leads participants, relies on unsupported assumptions, or asks too much at once. Evaluate each question before using it.
- Can the question be answered with a simple yes or no?
- Does it suggest that one conclusion is obviously correct?
- Does it contain two or three different questions at once?
- Is the wording understandable without specialized terminology?
- Can participants answer using the information or experience available to them?
- Does it ask for evidence, explanation, comparison, or reflection?
- Could it pressure someone to disclose information they would rather keep private?
- Does it fit the learning goal and available time?
Revise Leading, Loaded, or Unclear Questions
Ask AI to identify potential problems, but make the final judgment yourself. A neutral question invites examination rather than steering participants toward the moderator’s preferred conclusion.
Sample Prompt: Critique the Questions
Review these questions for leading language, hidden assumptions, false choices, unnecessary complexity, jargon, personal sensitivity, and mismatch with the learning goal. For each concern, explain the issue and propose a more neutral, concise revision. Do not change a question unless you can identify a specific problem.
| Less Effective Question |
Concern |
Stronger Revision |
| Why have museums ignored important contributors to aviation? |
Assumes intentional neglect before participants examine the evidence. |
Which contributors are emphasized or less visible in these examples, and what might help explain those choices? |
| Do you think this exhibit is accurate? |
Encourages a yes-or-no response and does not define accuracy. |
What claims does this exhibit make, and what additional evidence would help you evaluate those claims? |
| How did politics, funding, technology, community values, and individual personalities all affect this museum? |
Combines too many complex issues in one question. |
Which influence appears most visible in this presentation, and what evidence supports your interpretation? |
| Tell us about a time your family history was erased. |
Requests sensitive personal disclosure and may create pressure. |
What are some reasons a community’s history may become less visible over time? |
Build a Realistic Discussion Sequence
A 35-minute discussion does not require 15 questions. Select a small number and decide which questions are essential, optional, or useful only as follow-ups.
Sample Prompt: Create the Sequence
Using the strongest questions, create a 35-minute discussion sequence with one opening question, one clarifying question, two interpretive questions, one application question, and one closing question. Estimate the time for each part. Identify one optional question that can be omitted if time is short. Explain how the sequence moves from observation to deeper interpretation and synthesis.
Example 35-Minute Sequence
Opening observation — 4 minutes: What is the first detail you notice, and what draws your attention to it?
Clarifying the sources — 5 minutes: What does each description emphasize as important?
Interpretive comparison — 8 minutes: How does each presentation shape our understanding of who contributed to the story?
Interpretive evidence — 7 minutes: What is included, omitted, or left uncertain, and why might that matter?
Application — 7 minutes: What choices would you make when designing a small exhibit for new visitors?
Closing synthesis — 4 minutes: What responsibility do public-history organizations have when deciding what to preserve or revisit?
Prepare Follow-Up Prompts
Follow-up prompts help participants explain their thinking, connect ideas, and respond to one another. They are often more useful than immediately moving to the next prepared question.
Sample Prompt: Generate Facilitation Follow-Ups
Create eight brief, neutral follow-up prompts a moderator could use during this discussion. Include prompts that ask for evidence, clarification, comparison, another perspective, connection to an earlier point, and synthesis. Avoid praise that suggests one answer is preferred.
Useful Follow-Up Prompts
- What led you to that interpretation?
- Which detail supports that conclusion?
- Could you say more about what you mean?
- Does anyone see the source differently?
- How does that connect with the earlier example?
- What might another audience notice or value?
- What remains uncertain?
- What larger question does this raise?
Plan for Broad Participation
Good questions do not guarantee balanced participation. Decide how participants will have time to think and how you will make room for more than the fastest or most confident speakers.
- Provide the question before calling on anyone.
- Allow a few seconds of quiet thinking time.
- Use paired conversation before a full-group discussion when appropriate.
- Invite additional voices without putting individuals on the spot.
- Redirect respectfully when one participant dominates.
- Acknowledge disagreement without requiring immediate consensus.
- Summarize key themes and note unresolved questions.
Sample Prompt: Add Participation Strategies
For this 35-minute discussion, suggest a simple participation plan that includes quiet thinking time, one brief paired exchange, full-group discussion, and a closing synthesis. The plan should be practical for adult learners and should not require technology.
Save a Moderator-Approved Discussion Plan
Copy the final questions and facilitation notes into your weekly session plan. Do not rely on the AI conversation during class.
- Record the session goal and purpose of the discussion.
- Save the essential questions in sequence.
- Mark optional questions that can be omitted.
- Add estimated timing.
- Save several neutral follow-up prompts.
- Note any sensitive topics or wording to handle carefully.
- Record how participants will think, pair, or contribute.
- Verify any factual premise included in a question.
Your Product from Module 3
You should now have a Discussion Facilitation Plan: a clear discussion purpose, a short sequence of open-ended questions, neutral follow-up prompts, realistic timing, participation strategies, and moderator notes for respectful facilitation.
Try It: Build a Five-Question Discussion
A 10-Minute Practice Activity
Select one session topic, image, reading, case, or idea from your seminar. Build a short question sequence rather than a large question bank.
Define
Write one sentence explaining what participants should think about, compare, interpret, or apply.
Generate
Ask AI for three opening, three interpretive, three application, and three closing options.
Revise
Remove yes-or-no, leading, overly broad, jargon-heavy, or unnecessarily personal questions.
Sequence
Select five questions, estimate the time, and add three neutral follow-up prompts.
Review Checkpoint Before Moving On
Before using an AI-assisted discussion plan, confirm that:
- Every question supports the session goal or discussion purpose.
- The sequence moves from an accessible entry point toward deeper thinking.
- Questions are open-ended, concise, and understandable.
- The wording does not lead participants toward one preferred conclusion.
- No question requires private or sensitive disclosure.
- The plan fits the available time and includes optional questions to omit.
- Follow-up prompts encourage explanation, evidence, comparison, and additional perspectives.
- Any factual premise within a question has been independently verified.
Best Practices
Start with Purpose
Decide what participants should do with the content before generating questions.
Generate More Than You Need
Create options, then select only the questions that support the strongest sequence.
Move from Accessible to Complex
Begin with observation or clarification before asking for interpretation or application.
Ask One Thing at a Time
Break multi-part questions into simpler prompts so participants know where to begin.
Use Follow-Ups
Invite evidence and explanation rather than rushing through every prepared question.
Plan for Silence
Allow thinking time. A short pause often produces more thoughtful and inclusive responses.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Using too many questions: A long list can produce shallow responses and rushed transitions.
- Starting with the hardest question: Participants may need observation and clarification before interpretation.
- Asking leading questions: Wording that signals the preferred answer limits genuine discussion.
- Combining several questions: Multi-part prompts make it unclear which issue participants should address.
- Confusing recall with discussion: A factual check may be useful, but it rarely sustains conversation by itself.
- Requiring personal disclosure: Participants should not feel pressured to reveal sensitive experiences or beliefs.
- Ignoring timing: Each meaningful question may require several minutes, especially when participants respond to one another.
- Moving on too quickly: Neutral follow-ups can deepen learning more effectively than another new question.
Resources and Related Guidance
- Use AI to Design a New Seminar
Return to Module 1 to clarify seminar goals and identify where engagement belongs in the overall plan.
- Use AI to Update an Existing Seminar
Return to Module 2 if the session purpose, scope, or sequence still needs revision.
- Creating Quality Learning Objectives
Strengthen the learning goal that your discussion questions are intended to support.
- Use Images, Charts and Media Effectively
Learn how to select and present visual material that can support observation, analysis, and discussion.
- AI Discussion Question Planner
A planned worksheet for defining purpose, generating options, evaluating wording, sequencing questions, and preparing follow-ups.
Download in development
- AI Seminar Development Workbook
A planned workbook connecting the practice activities from all five AI modules.
Download in development
Common Questions
How many questions should I prepare?
Prepare more options than you expect to use, but identify a small set of essential questions. For a 30- to 35-minute discussion, five or six core questions may be more than enough when participants respond to one another.
What should I do when no one answers immediately?
Allow several seconds of quiet thinking time. Restate the question more simply, invite participants to review a source or image, or use a brief paired exchange before returning to the full group.
Can AI predict which questions participants will like?
No. AI can suggest questions based on the context you provide, but it does not know the individuals in the room. Prepare alternatives and adjust based on participant interest, understanding, and available time.
What if a discussion moves in an unexpected but useful direction?
You do not need to ask every prepared question. Use the session goal to decide whether to follow the new direction, connect it back to the topic, or save it for later.
How should I handle disagreement?
Return to the question, evidence, or source under discussion. Invite participants to explain their reasoning, distinguish disagreement from personal criticism, and summarize areas of agreement, difference, or uncertainty without forcing consensus.
Previous: Update an Existing Seminar
Return to Module 2 to refine the session purpose, scope, and structure.
Return to Module 2
Next: Create or Simplify Handouts
Turn seminar content into clear, useful, participant-friendly materials.
Continue to Module 4
University of Dayton Olli